Search for: "THE DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY"
Results 1 - 20
of 519
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jan 2021, 7:33 am
I often get asked questions about the Division of Child Protection & Permanency, more commonly referred to by its old name, DYFS. [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 4:03 pm
In the matter of New Jersey Division of Child Protection and Permanency v. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 6:12 am
Although the typical matrimonial practitioner may not undertake Division of Child Protection and Permanency (“Division”) on a regular basis, we oftentimes face situations wherein a trial court, in a related matrimonial proceedings, determines Division investigations to be relevant to determinations of custody and parenting time before it. [read post]
10 Jul 2015, 2:25 am
Michael Child Protective Services (CPS), which is known here as the Texas Department of Family and Protective Services (DFPS), is a division within the State and local social services that plays a pivotal role in the cases of child abuse and neglect. [read post]
10 Jul 2015, 2:25 am
MichaelChild Protective Services (CPS), which is known here as the Texas Department of Family and Protective Services (DFPS), is a division within the State and local social services that plays a pivotal role in the cases of child abuse and neglect. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 7:25 am
On February 1, 2017, the New Jersey Appellate Division published its opinion in the case of New Jersey Division of Child Protection and Permanency v. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 3:07 pm
Senator Kip Bateman’s legislation requiring witnesses of child sexual abuse to immediately report it to the Division of Child Protection and Permanency has passed the New Jersey Senate. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 7:25 am
On February 1, 2017, the New Jersey Appellate Division published its opinion in the case of New Jersey Division of Child Protection and Permanency v. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 10:45 am
” Bateman’s bipartisan bill, S-641, requires that sexual abuse against a child be directly reported to the Division of Child Protection and Permanency. [read post]
5 Nov 2018, 12:59 pm
In the published Appellate Division opinion in NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY v. [read post]
2 Aug 2021, 9:00 pm
If the New Jersey Division of Child Protection and Permanency (DCPP) (formerly known as the Division of Youth and Family Services (DYFS)) has come to your home and taken your child, you understandably want to do everything you can to bring your child home as quickly as possible. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 10:00 am
New Jersey Division of Child Protection and Permanency v. [read post]
18 Mar 2009, 2:35 am
Regina (V: a Child) v Independent Appeal Panel for Tom Hood School and Others Queen’s Bench Division “The permanent exclusion of a child from a particular school did not engage the fair trial provisions protected by article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights; the standard of proof in establishing facts was the balance of probabilities. [read post]
13 Nov 2012, 10:52 am
New Jersey Governor Chris Christie signed off on legislation [L. 2012, c. 16] that reorganized the Department of Children and Families and renamed DYFS [Division of Youth and Family Services] as the Division of Child Protection and Permanency. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 12:52 pm
In a child protective proceeding, the Appellate Division considered whether the mother had taken sufficient steps to be reunified with her children. [read post]
30 May 2017, 10:10 am
In the published opinion in the matter of Division of Child Protection and Permanency v. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 10:56 am
When it came to the hearing, a caseworker from the New Jersey Division of Child Protection and Permanency was called as a witness. [read post]
23 Dec 2010, 10:05 am
Child Protective Services is one of the agencies that may investigate a claim of child abuse. [read post]
10 Sep 2018, 9:46 am
In this Appellate Division case entitled New Jersey Division of Child Protection and Permanency v. [read post]
17 Feb 2020, 7:23 am
In this case the Appellate Division considered whether the lower court properly concluded that the permanency goal in a child protective proceeding was to be placement for adoption instead of reunification with the mother. [read post]
